SearchNavigationUser loginAdvertisements |
Fresh - FacedJust how far are you willing to go for that youthful glow? by Stephanie Macdonald
Beauty is only skin deep; it’s in the eye of the beholder; it is but a flower, which wrinkles will devour… Whichever cliché you subscribe to, it’s hard not to notice the abundance of people—mostly women—in every chic restaurant and posh shopping boulevard who sport disconcertingly frozen expressions of placidity, permanently surprised eyebrows, and duck lips. Interestingly, though, while aesthetic medicine used to be the domain of pricey plastic surgeons with a tenuous grasp of the Hippocratic oath, these days a less-radical, less-invasive generation of anti-aging treatments is being practised by everyone from highly respected dermatologists to naturopaths. Graceful acceptance of the aging process is the cheapest and probably most effective way to happiness. But in the interests of those of us who aren’t quite there yet, here’s the lowdown on those non-surgical “rejuvenating” procedures we’re always hearing about. Botox Pros: It is effective, preventative, relatively affordable, and proven safe when (and this is very important) administered by an expert. No downtime. Cons: Naturopaths still think it is bad to inject yourself with poison (or any non-natural substance) for any reason. Also, you could end up looking like a Stepford Wife or stroke victim if not injected correctly (but only for six months or so!). Dermal fillers Pros: They work immediately and can provide surgery-like results, especially used in conjunction with Botox. Cons: See Botox. Also, without proper application, in the words of one doctor, “You can end up looking like you just got out of a pond somewhere.” Laser treatments, focused ultra sound, intense pulsed light, and radiofrequency treatments Pros: The most effective therapy, with often quite dramatic results, especially on people with acne scars, wrinkles, rosacea, and age spots. Even some naturopaths are offering laser (“light-based”) treatments to patients. Cons: Expensive. Recovery time and results vary. Certain treatments can be quite uncomfortable. Dermabrasion and facial peels Pros: Inexpensive, readily available, no side effects. Cons: Not as effective as lasers; can be mildly uncomfortable. Facial fitness or rejuvenation Pros: Natural, with no side effects. Cons: Many sessions are needed to see results. Cosmetic acupuncture Pros: Can also increase the body’s natural chi (life force), increasing overall health and a strong stress response. Cons: Results vary; monthly maintenance treatments required. Cosmetic dentistry Pros: Can improve overall health by restoring Cons: Can be expensive, and veneers have to be properly maintained or they break. The “natural” vs. “unnatural” distinction is abstract, so it is up to an individual to determine her or his own threshold for technology and invasiveness. The most pronounced benefit of a naturopathic approach, such as that offered at Integrative Healing Arts or by Dr. Maria Fabbro, is that, by approaching the process of aging from a holistic and systemic point of view, it’s possible to simultaneously invigorate both the outside and inside of the body. You end up looking and feeling better, and avoiding duck lips altogether. Stephanie MacDonald is a Vancouver writer who worries that stressing about wrinkles will turn them into a self-fulfilling prophecy. |
Advertisements |